Unphysical Magnetic Field Parity: Two Impossibility Directions for Hawking-Induced Magnetism

Author: J. Landers

Abstract

We analyze whether a magnetic field generated by Hawking radiation near a Kerr black hole can ever reach parity with a plasma / accretion-disk–generated magnetic field. We present two complementary mathematical results. First, a forward “no-parity” theorem: a bounded spin-dependent factor and a tiny physical prefactor impose a strict ceiling on the Hawking-induced contribution, preventing equality with the plasma field over the admissible domain. Second, an inverse non-identifiability theorem in a poloidal–toroidal (PT) spherical-harmonic decomposition: even from complete measurements of the aggregate field, the Hawking component cannot be stably recovered; in information-theoretic terms, the measurement channel has effectively zero capacity for that component. Together, these establish a two-sided impossibility: no parity in forward models and no recovery in inverse models.

1. Context and Setup

Let $a^* \in [0,1]$ denote the dimensionless Kerr spin, $M$ the mass, $r_+=M\!\left(1+\sqrt{1-(a^*)^2}\right)$ the horizon radius (geometric units), and $\Omega_H=\dfrac{a^*}{2Mr_+}$ the horizon angular velocity. On physical grounds, the Hawking-induced magnetic field amplitude near the horizon carries a factor $$ g(a^*) \;\equiv\; a^*\sqrt{1-(a^*)^2}, \qquad 0 \le g(a^*) \le \tfrac12, $$ multiplying a very small prefactor $C\ll 1$ determined by constants and microscopic efficiencies. By contrast, a plasma/disk dynamo field increases with accessible rotational energy and does not inherit the same universal geometric cap.

Intuition. At small $a^*$, the Hawking side appears to grow (quadratically in $a^*$), but the $\sqrt{\,1-(a^*)^2\,}$ factor enforces a hard maximum at $a^*=1/\sqrt2$. The plasma side is limited by astrophysical conditions, not by a Kerr-geometry cap.

2. Forward Direction: No-Parity Theorem

Definition (Parity). On a domain $D\subseteq[0,1]$ in spin (or an equivalent evolution parameter), the Hawking-induced field $B_{\mathrm{H}}(a^*)$ and the plasma field $B_{\mathrm{pl}}(a^*)$ achieve parity if $\exists\,a^*_0\in D$ such that $B_{\mathrm{H}}(a^*_0)=B_{\mathrm{pl}}(a^*_0)$.
Theorem 1 (No parity under admissibility cap). Let $D=[0,a^*_{\max}]$ with $0<a^*_{\max}\le 1$. Suppose $$ B_{\mathrm{H}}(a^*) \;=\; C\,g(a^*), \qquad g(a^*)=a^*\sqrt{1-(a^*)^2}, \qquad 0\le C\le C_{\max}, $$ and the plasma field obeys a monotone lower bound $$ B_{\mathrm{pl}}(a^*) \;\ge\; A(a^*) \;\;\text{on } D, $$ for some increasing function $A$ with $A(a^*_{\max}) \gt C_{\max}\,\max_{a^*\in D} g(a^*)$. Then $B_{\mathrm{H}}(a^*) < B_{\mathrm{pl}}(a^*)$ for all $a^*\in D$; in particular, parity is impossible on $D$.
Proof. For all $a^*\in D$, $B_{\mathrm{H}}(a^*)\le C_{\max}\max_{D} g = C_{\max}g_{\max}$ with $g_{\max}\le \tfrac12$. By hypothesis, $A(a^*_{\max}) > C_{\max}g_{\max}$ and $A$ is increasing, hence $A(a^*)\ge A(a^*_{\max}) > C_{\max}g_{\max} \ge B_{\mathrm{H}}(a^*)$ for all $a^*$. Since $B_{\mathrm{pl}} \ge A$, we obtain $B_{\mathrm{H}}(a^*)<B_{\mathrm{pl}}(a^*)$ on $D$. ∎
This is a simple “ceiling vs. ramp” argument: if one curve is globally capped and the other grows past that cap somewhere in the admissible window, they never meet.
Corollary 1 (Linear lower envelope). If $B_{\mathrm{pl}}(a^*)\ge \alpha\,a^*$ on $D=[0,a^*_{\max}]$ with $\alpha>0$, then a sufficient condition for no parity is $$ C_{\max}\,\max_{a^*\in D} g(a^*) \;<\; \alpha\,a^*_{\max}. $$ Since $\max g=\tfrac12$ (attained at $a^*=1/\sqrt2$), any choice with $C_{\max}/2 < \alpha\,a^*_{\max}$ suffices.
Corollary 2 (ΩH-form). If $B_{\mathrm{pl}} \propto \Omega_H$ and $B_{\mathrm{H}}\propto (r_+)^{-1}/\sqrt{1-(a^*)^2}$, then equating $B_{\mathrm{H}}=B_{\mathrm{pl}}$ eliminates $r_+$ and reduces to $$ a^*\sqrt{1-(a^*)^2} \;=\; \text{constant} \times C, $$ i.e., the same capped geometric factor appears. With $C\ll 1$, no admissible $a^*$ yields parity.

3. Inverse Direction: Non-identifiability in a PT–Spherical-Harmonic Basis

On a sphere $r=R$ outside the horizon, decompose the divergence-free magnetic field via the poloidal–toroidal (PT) representation: $$ \mathbf{B}(R,\theta,\phi) \;=\; \nabla\times\big(T(R,\theta,\phi)\,\hat{\mathbf{r}}\big) \;+\; \nabla\times\nabla\times\big(P(R,\theta,\phi)\,\hat{\mathbf{r}}\big), $$ with $T,P$ expanded in spherical harmonics $Y_{\ell m}$. Let the modal coefficients be $T_{\ell m}(R), P_{\ell m}(R)$, and split each as a sum of plasma and Hawking contributions: $$ T_{\ell m}=T^{(\mathrm{pl})}_{\ell m}+T^{(\mathrm{H})}_{\ell m},\qquad P_{\ell m}=P^{(\mathrm{pl})}_{\ell m}+P^{(\mathrm{H})}_{\ell m}. $$

Theorem 2 (Non-identifiability & zero-capacity bound). Assume for every $(\ell,m)$ the Hawking modal amplitudes are bounded by $$ \big|T^{(\mathrm{H})}_{\ell m}\big|,\ \big|P^{(\mathrm{H})}_{\ell m}\big| \;\le\; C_{\ell m}, $$ with $C_{\ell m}$ proportional to $C\,g(a^*)$ (hence extremely small). Suppose the plasma model has uncertainty $\Delta p_{\ell m}$ (turbulence/modeling/noise) so the measured coefficient $b_{\ell m}$ satisfies $$ b_{\ell m} \;=\; p^{(\mathrm{model})}_{\ell m} \;+\; \Delta p_{\ell m} \;+\; h^{(\mathrm{H})}_{\ell m}, $$ where $h^{(\mathrm{H})}_{\ell m}$ denotes the true Hawking coefficient. If no prior guarantees $|\Delta p_{\ell m}| < C_{\ell m}$, then $h^{(\mathrm{H})}_{\ell m}$ is not uniquely recoverable from $b_{\ell m}$. Moreover, any estimator can certify at most $$ \big|h^{(\mathrm{H})}_{\ell m}\big| \;\le\; \min\!\big\{\,\big|b_{\ell m}-p^{(\mathrm{model})}_{\ell m}\big|,\ C_{\ell m}\big\}. $$
Proof. Fix $(\ell,m)$. For any admissible $h$ with $|h|\le C_{\ell m}$, choose an equally admissible plasma error $\Delta p = (b-p^{(\mathrm{model})})-h$. Without a prior restricting $|\Delta p|$, both $(h,\Delta p)$ and $(0,\,\Delta p+h)$ explain the same observation $b$. Hence $h$ is not identifiable; only the bound stated follows by triangle inequality. ∎
Information-theoretic phrasing. If plasma variability spans the Hawking bound, then the mutual information $I(b_{\ell m};\,h^{(\mathrm{H})}_{\ell m})=0$: the measurement channel has no capacity to transmit Hawking-mode amplitudes beyond the trivial upper bound.

Intuition. The Hawking piece is so tiny that ordinary plasma variability can always “mask” it within the same mode. In coefficient space, the Hawking vector lies inside the plasma-error uncertainty ball; any putative Hawking signal can be reinterpreted as plasma jitter.

4. Synthesis and Implications

Together, these show the Hawking-radiation magnetic field is not merely practically undetectable; it is structurally excluded in both forward and inverse senses. The magnetic degrees of freedom that could be conveyed by Hawking quanta are mathematically barred from parity and from stable recovery.

5. Minimal Reference Relations (for completeness)